Doc. Puslitbang Activities

Head of Law and Public Relations Bureau of the Indonesian Supreme Court Abdullah Passes Away

Jakarta-Bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id. Abdullah, the Head of Biro Hukum dan Humas Mahkamah Agung RI (Law and Public Relations Bureau of the Indonesian Supreme Court) has passed away on Saturday, October 31, 2020 at 01.45 WIB at Siloam Hospital, Surabaya.

The man who was born on October 4, 1961, in Jombang, East Java, started his career as a staff in 1992. His career as a Judge began at the First Level at Praya District Court in 1996. He held the position as Vice Chief Judge of Malang District Court in 2016.

In Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil MA RI (Agency of Research, Development, and Training Center for Law and Judiciary of the Indonesian Supreme Court) itself, he was a part of the family. Apart from being a Tutor Judge, he also served as an Official of Echelon III in Pusdiklat Teknis Peradilan (Judicial Technical Training Center).

This alumnus of the University of 17 August 1945 Surabaya, has served as the Head of the Law and Public Relations Bureau of the Indonesian Supreme Court since June 15, 2017, until recently. Abdullah has left a wife and three children.

 Our deepest condolences go out to Dr. Abdullah. May Allah forgive and give him maghfirah. May his good deeds guide his way to Heaven. Rest in Peace. 

 

(Rewritten by AAs, Reviewed by CCp Source: https://bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/puslitbang-id/dok-keg-puslitbang-id/1683-innalillahi-kepala-biro-humas-mahkamah-agung-meninggal-dunia)

Great Grieve, Researcher Mul Irawan Passes Away

Jakarta-Bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id Puslitbang Kumdil MA RI (Indonesian Supreme Court Center of Research and Development of Law and Judiciary) has mourned because one of its researchers dies. Mul Irawan has passed away in the city of Palu, Central Sulawesi, on Monday, October 12, 2020, at 7 a.m WITA. 

 Previously, he served as the Head of Sub-Section of General and Financial Affairs of the Samarinda Religious Court Class 1-A from January 2014 to December 2015. He further has joined in at Puslitbang Kumdil MA RI as a Researcher since 2016. His expert focuses on a realm of religious judicial.

 He produced several pieces of research work while being a researcher, including a title with ‘Implementation of Small Claim Court in Settlement of Sharia Economic Cases in Religious Courts under the PERMA Number 14 of 2016’ and ‘Strengthening the Implementation of Syariah Court Authority in Resolving Jinayah Cases in Aceh.’ He directly coordinated both of these studies. Even until recently, he has also actively involved in research on ‘Enforcement of Sharia Economic Law’ together with the Head of Puslitbang Kumdil MA RI. His works are valuable and have a significant contribution to research on the religious judiciary.

As the Head of Puslitbang Kumdil MA RI, Hasbi Hasan feels great grieve for the passing of this talented researcher. “We have lost a researcher whose highly-dedicated, productive, sincerely hard-worked, honest, polite, and responsible,” said him when hearing the grief news. 

Rest in Peace, Mul Irawan. Our deepest condolences go out to you. May Allah forgive you and take you to receive maghfirah. May his good deeds guide his way to Heaven. Rest in Peace. Amen. (Rewritten by AAs) 

 

 

Source: https://bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/puslitbang-id/dok-keg-puslitbang-id/1680-puslitbang-kumdil-mahkamah-agung-berduka-salah-seorang-peneliti-handal-puslitbang-berpulang)

Scientific Publication to Improve Researchers’Competency

Bekasi, bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id- Improving Human Resources’quality is the active role of Research and Development for Law and Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia to run scientific publication to increase the researchers’competency, said  the head of Research, Development, and Training for Law and Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Dr. Zarof Ricar, S.H., S,Sos,.M, Hum in his remark in the technical guidance of Research Management and Journal organizing in Santika Premiere Hotel Bekasi (12/02/2020).

Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia held the routine event for three days before research undertook. The main objective of technical guidance of research and scientific journal organizing was to refresh old knowledge and transfer new knowledge to all research and development center’s human resources

Dr. Hasbi Hasan, MH, the head of Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia said that this event was divided into two parts: they were about research management and journal organizing and writing

The topic about research planning presented by resource person from the Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovatiob Agency. The next topic was about Correspondence of Research Writing presented by source person from National Archives Agency. The topic about the budget-stimate plan and the nominative listpresented by the auditor from Oversight Agency of Supreme Court of the Republic Indonesia and Prof. Dr. Dra. Sulistyowati Irianto, MA presented the topic about the research conduct

This event was attended by at least one hundred (100) participants consisting of High Court Judges, Justicial Judges, Researchers, and research data processor of the research in the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction.(JLD/edited_CCP)

 http://bit.ly/upgradinglitbang

Reconstruction of the Position and Authority of Judicial Commission of oversighting Suprme Court and Its Judicial Bodies

Jakarta-Bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id. Research and Development Center for Law And Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia held Focus Group Discussion (FGD), on 31 January 2020 regarding Reconstruction the Position of Judicial Commission over Supreme Court. That theme is one of the issues that the Research and Development Center focused on. This theme would be followed up by researching the priority program of the Research and Development Center in 2020’s budget implementation registration form.

Starting his remark as the person in charge of the Research, the Head of Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary  of the Republic of Indonesia Dr. Hasbi Hasan reiterated that the Research led by Cecep Mustafa, SH.,LLM, PhD was supposed to search and find the ideal position for Judicial Commission particularly the position of the head of Judicial Commission which could serve as the Chief Justice of the Republic of Indonesia. The position of the head of Judicial Commission simultaneously served as Chief Justice had been practised in the few countries such as Australia and other countries. According to Hasbi Hasan, this kind of position, in case of oversight and enforcing the Judges'code of ethics relating to maintain the dignity, prestige and authority of judges could run well and effective

The keynote speaker of Focus Group Discussion was Professor Dr. Zainal Arifien Husein, SH, MH (Professor of Muhammadiyah University’s Law Faculty Jakarta), simultanously joined as the Research team. He reiterated that this research was really exact to conduct as an effort to maintain and re-position the position and function of independent legal power as written in constitution to enforce the law and justice. There was no commission in the world could be guaranteed in the Constitution as the institution of legal power. Therefore,any actions aiming at eroding of legal power needed to be questioned.

Then, Prof Zainal said that there was misinterpretation conducted by Judicial Commission in the article 24 b of Constitution of 1945 to maintain and enforce the honour, glory and authority of Judges. This misinterpretation was used by Judicial Commission to enlarge their illegitimate power to take part in selecting the judge’s candidate. On the contrary, the main function of Judicial Commission only selected Justices and proposed the promotion of Justices. Judicial Commision was supposed to focus and consistent of their duty and main function to enforce the code of ethics and conduct of Judges. This action was to maintain dignity and honor of Judges because Judicial Commission actually was an institution whose task to oversight the code of ethics and conduct of Judges. Judicial Commission did not have authority to oversight on technical judiciary

The other keynote speaker was Dr. Margarito Kamis representing the experts of administrative law reiterated that the main point of this study was oversighting Judges conducted by Judicial Commission which had practically had violated the constitution. What was supposed to oversight had biased. The contradictive matter which had been existed since Judicial Commission was formed was the misleading practical oversight conducted by Judicial Commission. He added that this research was expected to underline the oversight’s object conducted by Judicial Commission as mandated by Constitution

The next keynote speaker was Bapak Dr. Binsar Gultom, the High Court Judge of Banten’s High Court. He conveyed more facts in real practical oversight conducted by Judicial Commission which had violated the law. According to him, Judicial Commission had not oversighted maximally, in addition, their oversight was regarded as manipulation. One of the oversights conducted by Judicial Commission was experienced personally by Bapak Dr. Binsar Gultom. He never was examined related to the claim against him regarding violating judge’s code of Ethics during his serve as the Judge of Palembang’s District Court. On the contrary, five years later, surprisingly, he got the official letter from Judicial Commission when he served as High Court Judge of Banten’s High Court connected with vindication, reported by the public, meanwhile He was never examined related to that matter. Actually, Dr. Binsar Gultom minded to this case because his track record had been blacklisted in Judicial Commission. This matter would block his career as a judge in the future.

This case strengthened Dr. Binsar Gultom’s argumentation that Judicial Commission had not understood and misled to conduct the function and duty to maintain the dignity and prestige of the Judges. Dr. Binsar had experienced other cases which triggered him to file the Judicial Review to Constitutional Court as well as to State Administrative Court. Therefore, this research was important to give input to reconstruct the position and function of Judicial Commission as refer to the Constitution of 1945

Meanwhile, the participants attended to Forum Group Discussion consisted of High Court Judges of Oversight, Justicial Judges of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Justicial Judges of Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary and researchers of Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Participants focused more on the uncertain function of Judicial Commission which had not functioned maximally to date. Judicial Commission ignored the ongoing condition, such as Public attacked and burnt the court’s building and threatened the dignity and prestige of the judges. There was no respond from Judicial Commission to conduct its function. Judicial Commission oversighted more overlimited of its main duty.

The host of forum group discussion, Dr. Ismail Rumadhan concluded that main problems which had to focus on this research titled Reconstruction of Judicial Commission’s position over Supreme Court were reconstruction on few areas. First, reconstruction to the position of Judicial Commission which was supposed to return to its position as commission institution, it was not the judicial power executor’s function. Second, the position of the head of Judicial Commission that  could be served also by the Chief Justice. Third, it was about the roadmap of oversighting authority and oversight’s object conducted by Judicial Commission. (JLD/edited_CCP)

Research on Academic Draft of Substitute Registrar’s Functional Official in Bandung

Bandung, bldk.mahkamahagung.go.id- Research and Development Center For Law and Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia re-held Forum Group Discussion (FGD) regarding establishing Academic Draft of Substitute Registrar’s Functional Official in Swiss Bell Hotel, Bandung West Java, on Tuesday 28 January 2020 pioneered by Bapak Budi Suhariyanto, SH, MH as the Researcher of Research and Development Center For Law and Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Budi Suhariyanto reiterated that the Research Team was assigned by the top leaders of Supreme Court to establish the Academic Draft of Substitute Registrar’s Functional Official to become the Regulation of Ministry of Administrative and Bureaucratic Reform in short period. This research was targeted by the top leaders to accomplish the research before the end of June 2020. The turning of the official to the functional official of substitute registrar had to be clear of the function of their expert.

In his explanation, Budi Suhariyanto also explained about the step of carrier and the allowance of substitute registrar would be almost same as the computer operator which had been turned into functional official of Judiciary Administration. They were First Judiciary Administrator of Functional Official, Junior Judiciary Administrator of Functional Official and Middle Judiciary Administrator of Functional Official.

Twelve participants attended the event of Forum Group Discussion. They were Sugeng Wahyudi, SH., MM, the Registrar of Bandung’s High Court, Hj. R. Iin Mutmainah, SH., MH, the Deputy Registrar of Legal Matters of Bandung’s High Court, H. Nanang Priatna, SH, Deputy Registrar of Special Criminal Case of Bandung’s High Court, Tri Mulyani, SH., MH, Substitute Registrar of Bandung’s High Court, Nurdina, SH, Substitute Registrar of Bandung’s High Court, Susilo Nandang Bagyo, SH., MH, Deputy Registrar of Civil Case of Bandung’s District Court, Wisnu Prawira, SE., SH., MH, Substitute Registrar of Bandung’s District Court, Maman Supratman, SH., MH, Substitute Registrar of Bandung’s District Court, Enang Suparman, SH., MH, Deputy Registrar of Criminal Case of Bale Bandung’s District Court, Darmawan Saputra, SH, Deputy Registrar of Legal Matters of Bale Bandung’s District Court, Bambang Setia Putra, SH, Substitute Registrar of Bale Bandung’s District Court, Girry Jaya Wijaya, SH., MH, Substitute Registrar of Bale Bandung’s District Court. The Participants of Forum Group Discussion who attended the event are Muh. Ridha Hakim,S.H.,M.H, the host of the Forum Group Discussion and Bu Dini Widaningsih. The other researchers are Bapak Dr. Mul Irawan, S. Ag., M. Ag and Bapak Tumbur Palti Daniel Hutapea, SH., MH, the junior researchers of Research and Development Center for Law and Judiciary of Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.(JLD/edited_CCP)

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Contact Us

    Legal and Judicial Training and Development Agency
    Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia

    Office: Jl. South Cikopo Sukamaju Village, Kec. Megamendung
    Bogor, West Java 16770

    Phone: (0251) 8249520, 8249522, 8249531, 8249539
    Fax: (0251) 8249522, 8249539
    Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.